<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: (ATM0/0): CRC error in rcvPakFrame on Cisco 1751</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.networkingblog.in/atm00-crc-error-in-rcvpakframe-on-cisco-1751-859/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.networkingblog.in/atm00-crc-error-in-rcvpakframe-on-cisco-1751-859</link>
	<description>Cisco Netpro Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 06:07:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: arul</title>
		<link>http://www.networkingblog.in/atm00-crc-error-in-rcvpakframe-on-cisco-1751-859/comment-page-1#comment-710</link>
		<dc:creator>arul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 09:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.networkingblog.in/?p=859#comment-710</guid>
		<description>Hi ,


The CRC errors are light but for the moment, the tunnel is up. I will check next time the tunnel goes down if the CRC are increasing but it seems to be the only errors encountering in the vpn router.

I will get in touch with the provider. Thanks !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--INFOLINKS_ON-->Hi ,</p>
<p>The CRC errors are light but for the moment, the tunnel is up. I will check next time the tunnel goes down if the CRC are increasing but it seems to be the only errors encountering in the vpn router.</p>
<p>I will get in touch with the provider. Thanks !<!--INFOLINKS_OFF--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karan</title>
		<link>http://www.networkingblog.in/atm00-crc-error-in-rcvpakframe-on-cisco-1751-859/comment-page-1#comment-709</link>
		<dc:creator>karan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 09:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.networkingblog.in/?p=859#comment-709</guid>
		<description>Hello,

there are CRC errors but in 20 minutes they are 29 and you have received 19000 packets.
Unless these errors come in bursts (many in a row)  they shouldn&#039;t be able to turn down the IPSec session.

the current DSL line parameters are good with 20 DB of noise margin. There are no reed salomon errors.

 

On a line always there are some errors  the problem starts if they are able to affect traffic.

 From current statistics it is unlike they can cause issues just a slight performance reduction.

The scenario probably was far worse in the past hours.

I would ask to the DSL provider a check of the line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--INFOLINKS_ON-->Hello,</p>
<p>there are CRC errors but in 20 minutes they are 29 and you have received 19000 packets.<br />
Unless these errors come in bursts (many in a row)  they shouldn&#8217;t be able to turn down the IPSec session.</p>
<p>the current DSL line parameters are good with 20 DB of noise margin. There are no reed salomon errors.</p>
<p>On a line always there are some errors  the problem starts if they are able to affect traffic.</p>
<p> From current statistics it is unlike they can cause issues just a slight performance reduction.</p>
<p>The scenario probably was far worse in the past hours.</p>
<p>I would ask to the DSL provider a check of the line.<!--INFOLINKS_OFF--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
